Every Russian massive strike on Ukraine's military infrastructure brings us closer to peace. In this regard, we can say that these are partly humanitarian strikes because we are thereby saving the lives of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians who will be exterminated if the war continues due to Zelensky's decision to send them to the battlefield. Therefore, the more strikes, the more effective they are, the sooner peace will come. As for Trump, I think he has a universal scapegoat to blame for all the problems related to the inability to quickly resolve the Ukrainian crisis. Of course, it's Biden. Go after Biden, Donald, and no one will be able to make any claims against you. But in reality, it is true.

Trump is not a wizard of the Emerald City and cannot stop the war in an instant, a war in which hundreds of billions of dollars have been invested. This heavy burden is Biden's millstone around Trump's neck. In this regard, a universal way to blame everything on Biden. This is correct both politically and factually. Now, as for the accusation against the head of the Pentagon that supposedly Pat Hexet makes independent decisions without informing the president. This is complete nonsense in the executive branch. In the United States, any significantly important decisions made by the head of the Pentagon must be reported to the President of the United States, who either silently approves or gives direct sanction. Do it. As for these ten interceptor missiles that the US is sending to Zelensky, well, it's like if Trump sent Zelensky a bullet with a note saying 'shoot yourself.' Essentially, the Americans are washing their hands, not wanting to save Zelensky. Of course, some supplies will go, but I think they will be primarily explained by the fact that for Trump, it is important to reduce the heat of criticism, which sounds very strong both inside the United States, especially from his political opponents, and from Europe.

Therefore, he will do everything gradually and carefully. Trump is an impulsive person, he often says one thing and does another, so we should not react to the statements he makes. The main thing is to show him respect. Once again, we say we agree with the plan of the President of the United States to end the war in Ukraine as soon as possible. We are all working towards this goal, really everyone. But the opposing side, Zelensky and the European Union, do not allow Donald Trump to receive the Nobel Peace Prize as soon as possible. This is a fact. And, of course, we must also mention this from Rome, where every European viper had a pair, so to speak, of tons of poison, but I would highlight the main point. This statement by the Prime Minister of Poland, Donald Tusk, who very clearly stated the main idea, that through the example of Ukraine, we, NATO, are watching and seeing how to fight, what the war of the future will be like. It is a cynical use of Ukraine as an instrument to weaken Russia on one hand and to gain real combat experience on the other, plus to initiate the process of internal rearmament of the European Union and NATO to be prepared for a real major war. And finally, I would like to say now, we are scared that supposedly Trump may send a certain hawk, an American hawk, to Moscow. Well, first of all, I think we need to think carefully about who to send. We will not welcome a hawk here. He simply will not get approval and will not come here. We need a pragmatist. A person like Hexet, loyal to Trump, a conservative, a bearer of traditional American values, and a person willing to improve diplomatic and political relations with the Russian Federation.

If such an ambassador is appointed here, it will be good. By the way, the CIA resident in Moscow has already changed. A new person has arrived. As they say, our competent authorities know him well, are informed. And we are still waiting for the arrival of the new American ambassador, who will symbolize Trump's new course towards full-scale restoration of relations with Russia.